Alexander v. Cahill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While this defense may also have merit, the defense never gave notice before trial that it would raise the defense at trial.”
• “Unless the pretrial stipulation resolved the question of notice of a possible defense, however characterized, a trial judge, in the sound exercise of his or her discretion, should not admit facts that suggest the defense for the first time at trial.”
• “Rule 103 . . . requires that claims of error be predicated upon a ruling. If a party makes the tactical decision to object, the trial judge must . . . definitively rule thereby preserving both the objection and the basis for the ruling on the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wright v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2007-07-02· cited 9×
• McKinley v. Casson
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2013-10-31· cited 7×
• In re Appraisal of Dole Food Company, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2014-12-09
• Storick v. CFG LLC
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-03-30
• Rose v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2024-05-10
• InterMune, Inc. and Roche Holdings, Inc. v. W. Scott Harkonen, M.D.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2024-08-01
• Sunder Energy, LLC v. Tyler Jackson
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2024-12-10
• Suber v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2026-01-15

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange Litigation
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-02-26· cited 262×
• Breuer Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Toronado Systems of America, Inc., and Michael Marshak A/K/A Michael Majchrzak
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-08-16· cited 136×
• Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc., Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc.
  First Circuit· 1985-07-23· cited 125×
• Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Epstein Fisheries, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-04-27· cited 74×
• Jean D. Reichenbach, a Single Woman v. David H. Smith, Michael C. Bark and State Farm Fire& Casualty Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 1976-03-19· cited 72×
• John McShain Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Company v. Wings, Inc. And Butler Aviation-Friendship, Inc., Third Party v. Summit Aviation, Inc
  Third Circuit· 1977-10-07· cited 66×
• Seward v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1999-01-22· cited 66×
• Fred E. Hudspeth v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-09-13· cited 61×
• Quad/Graphics, Inc. v. Fass
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-11-03· cited 53×
• Capital Management Co. v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2002-12-18· cited 32×
• Jerry L. Kennon and Mary Ann Kennon, Individually and as Next Friend of Jerry L. Kennon, Jr. v. Slipstreamer, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-07-23· cited 26×
• Schlossman & Gunkelman, Inc. v. Tallman
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 23×
• William D. McHann v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-09-02· cited 22×
• State Highway Department v. Buzzuto
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1970-03-05· cited 18×
• Fowler v. Mumford
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1954-01-22· cited 16×
• Debera COCHENOUR, Appellant, v. CAMERON SAVINGS AND LOAN, F.A., Appellee, and David Just, Defendant
  Eighth Circuit· 1998-11-16· cited 11×
• Cannelongo v. Fidelity America Small Business Investment Co.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-04-18· cited 9×
• Bodner v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2000-05-30· cited 8×
• Feliciano v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1975-01-23· cited 5×
• Linda and Randy Arhart v. Micro Switch Manufacturing Company, a Division of Honeywell, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1986-09-04· cited 3×