Second Circuit· 3/12/2010
Alexander v. Cahill
Citations
- 598 F.3d 79
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5253
- 2010 WL 842711
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the appellant's . . . right to have counsel appointed on appeal [is a] jurisdictional matter 4 ; Lake v. City of Birmingham
- \the appellant's . . . right to have counsel appointed on appeal [is a] jurisdictional matter[]; Lake v. City of Birmingham
- holding “ ‘[e]ommercial speech that is not false or deceptive and does not concern unlawful activities may be restricted only in the service of a substantial governmental interest, and only through means that direct-ly advance that interest’ ”
- recognizing the terminological split but adopting the four-part locution
- rule restricting attorney advertising fails fourth prong because it “prohibits a category of advertising that is potentially misleading, but is not inherently or actually misleading in all cases”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker, Calabresi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Windsor v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2012-10-18· cited 139×
- Centro De La Comunidad Hispana De Locust Valley v. Town of Oyster BaySecond Circuit· 2017-08-22· cited 134×
- Heffner v. MurphyThird Circuit· 2014-02-19· cited 61×
- 1-800-411-Pain Referral v. Richard Tollefson, D.C.Eighth Circuit· 2014-03-10· cited 44×
- Public Citizen, Inc. v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary BoardFifth Circuit· 2011-01-31· cited 39×
- IMS Health Inc. v. SorrellSecond Circuit· 2010-11-23· cited 26×
- Grocery Manufacturers Ass'n v. SorrellD. Vermont· 2015-04-27· cited 18×
- Pedersen v. Office of Personnel ManagementD. Connecticut· 2012-07-31· cited 17×
- Ocheesee Creamery LLC v. Adam H. PutnamEleventh Circuit· 2017-03-20· cited 14×
- Gordon v. Kaleida HealthW.D. New York· 2010-05-13· cited 5×
- Rubenstein v. Florida BarS.D. Florida· 2014-12-09· cited 5×
- Centro De La Comunidad His-pana De Locust Valley v. Town of Oyster BayE.D. New York· 2015-09-03· cited 5×
- In Re ReinesFederal Circuit· 2014-11-05· cited 3×
- In re the Letter Decision of the Committee on Attorney AdvertisingSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2013-03-14· cited 2×
- Heffner v. MurphyM.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-05-08· cited 1×
- Cahill v. AlexanderSupreme Court· 2010-12-13
- Harrell v. Florida BarM.D. Florida· 2011-09-30
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,526×
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-05-24· cited 2,355×
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,826×
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court· 1975-03-18· cited 1,256×
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court· 1989-06-29· cited 1,218×
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,207×
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,180×
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,096×
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 976×
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 958×
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 941×
- Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.Second Circuit· 2003-02-25· cited 820×
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 809×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica FoundationSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 761×
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court· 1996-05-13· cited 685×
- Edenfield v. FaneSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 677×
- Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 624×
- Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-06-21· cited 525×
- Rowan v. United States Post Office DepartmentSupreme Court· 1970-06-15· cited 519×
- Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 473×
Other cases named Alexander v. Cahill
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.