Alter v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding manufacturer’s maintenance and repair manuals and revisions to those manuals were not new component systems
• holding GARA barred claim that maintenance manual failed to provide inspection instructions that would have allowed detection that defective component was failing
• finding no “authority which holds that a federal statute barring enforcement of claims in courts of the United States bars only claims arising within the United States”
• relying on federal decisions construing state statutes of repose similar to GARA and reaching the conclusion that the provision of maintenance and repair manuals is part of a \duty to warn as a manufacturer\
• \the manufacturer's provision of maintenance and repair manuals was part of its duty to warn as a manufacturer\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).