Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. Koelz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[WJhen a person contracts with a corporation, it must be assumed that person contemplated the almost certain likelihood of change in the corporation and its personnel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Equifax Services, Inc., D/B/A Equifax Commercial Specialists F/k/a White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc. v. Steven A. Hitz
  Tenth Circuit· 1990-06-04· cited 164×
• Aon Consulting v. Midlands Financial
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-05-09· cited 101×
• TXO Production Co. v. M.D. Mark, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-08-26· cited 37×
• OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED v. County Qwick Print, Inc.
  D. Maine· 2010-05-04· cited 16×
• Youtie v. MacY's Retail Holding, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-06-05· cited 14×
• Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corp. v. Carmelengo
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-04-12· cited 11×
• Roeder v. Ferrell-Duncan Clinic, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-12-23· cited 10×
• SOGETI USA LLC v. Scariano
  D. Arizona· 2009-03-27· cited 9×
• HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, Ltd. v. Bymoen
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2009-06-11· cited 9×
• Blankenship v. Better Business Bureau
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-12-26· cited 8×
• Symphony Diagnostic Services No. 1 Inc. v. Greenbaum
  Eighth Circuit· 2016-07-06· cited 8×
• Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative Co. v. Soyland Power Cooperative, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-12-23· cited 6×
• Equifax Services, Inc. v. Hitz
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-07-09· cited 5×
• Pro-Edge L.P. v. Gue
  N.D. Iowa· 2006-03-07· cited 2×
• Ace Supply Co. v. Walther
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1990-04-19
• Symphony Diagnostic Services No. 1, Inc. v. Greenbaum
  W.D. Missouri· 2015-03-16

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1947-06-24· cited 143×
• Mills v. Murray
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1971-10-04· cited 78×
• Osage Glass, Inc. v. Donovan
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1985-08-07· cited 65×
• Schnucks Twenty-Five, Inc. v. Bettendorf
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1979-10-30· cited 29×
• Thames v. Rotary Engineering Company
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1958-08-06· cited 27×
• Dodier Realty & Investment Co. v. St. Louis National Baseball Club, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1951-02-16· cited 27×
• Sun World Corp. v. Pennysaver, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-11-27· cited 26×
• Ruberoid v. GLASSMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-11-20· cited 26×
• The Munchak Corporation and Rdg Corporation, a Joint Venture D/B/A the Carolina Cougars v. William John Cunningham
  Fourth Circuit· 1972-04-05· cited 20×
• Schweiger v. Hoch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-06-12· cited 19×
• Saliterman v. Finney
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-01-22· cited 18×
• Hampton v. Hampton Beach Improvement Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1966-03-30· cited 17×
• Segal v. Greater Valley Terminal Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1964-03-26· cited 13×
• Alldredge v. Twenty-Five Thirty-Two Broadway Corp.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1974-05-06· cited 9×
• Evening News Ass'n v. Peterson
  District of Columbia· 1979-09-07· cited 3×
• Zweifel v. Zenge
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-11-12· cited 2×