Skip to main content
· 5/1/2000

Aldridge v. Edmunds

Citations

  • 750 A.2d 292
  • 561 Pa. 323
  • 2000 Pa. LEXIS 1059

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an erroneous ruling will only require the grant of a new trial if it was harmful or caused prejudice
  • holding that an erroneous ruling will only require the grant of a new trial if it was harmful or caused prejudice
  • holding that erroneous admission of hearsay did not prejudice results of trial so as to require reversal
  • recognizing that since experts may rely on authoritative publications in formulating their opinions, they may briefly reference such materials to explain the reasons underlying their opinions
  • recognizing that since experts may rely on authoritative publications in formulating their opinions, they may briefly reference such materials to explain the reasons underlying their opinions
  • recognizing that the trial court should carefully limit an expert’s reference to learned treatises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.