Fletcher v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[l]earned treatises discussing the safety of a product should ... be admissible in the plaintiffs case-in-chief to raise a presumption of notice!;][t]his is a non-hearsay purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hilgendorf v. St. John Hosp. and Medical Center Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2001-07-10· cited 60×
• Castellani, R., Aplts. v. Scranton Times
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-27· cited 46×
• Aldridge v. Edmunds
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-05-01· cited 43×
• Francisco v. Manson, Jackson & Kane, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-07-22· cited 11×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McComish v. DeSoi
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-05-04· cited 48×
• Dunn v. Lederle Laboratories
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-11-03· cited 48×
• Coger v. MacKinaw Products Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-06-27· cited 48×
• Fredericks v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1981-11-02· cited 32×
• Thompson v. Essex Wire Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-10-29· cited 20×
• Slocum v. Ford Motor Company
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-11-03· cited 18×
• Coon v. Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1966-09-27· cited 17×
• Stachowiak v. Subczynski
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1981-07-13· cited 16×
• Stanek v. Bergeon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-02-22· cited 13×
• Ellison v. Wayne County General Hospital
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-10-22· cited 7×
• Sponenburgh v. Wayne County
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-06-03· cited 5×
• Stachowiak v. Subczynski
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-09-10· cited 3×