Hyrcza v. West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding any error in the admission of expert testimony regarding the standard of care was harmless where another qualified expert testified to the same standard of care at trial
• discussing, in a case where no defendant filed a cross-claim against any other defendant, the right of a non-settling defendant to have a settling defendant included on the verdict slip
• “[T]he court reviewed the evidence against Settling Defendants at close of trial[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).