Aldrich v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the plaintiffs were entitled to the same protection in holding and enjoying the property as was their grantor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-05-17· cited 109×
• Clements Auto Company v. Service Bureau Corporation
  D. Minnesota· 1969-03-31· cited 16×
• Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-05-01· cited 6×
• Amato v. Haraden
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-06-14· cited 5×
• Phillips v. Blowers
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-08-30· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fritz v. Fritz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1905-02-24· cited 34×
• Karger v. Wangerin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-01-20· cited 28×
• Engquist v. Wirtjes
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-01-28· cited 22×
• Gifford v. Vore
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-10-28· cited 20×
• Fishman v. Nielsen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-05-16· cited 17×
• Neill v. Hake
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-12-26· cited 11×
• Blew v. Ritz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1901-04-05· cited 8×
• Helmer v. Shevlin-Mathieu Lumber Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1915-03-05· cited 8×
• Erickson v. Turnquist
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1956-06-29· cited 7×
• Donaldson v. Kohner
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-12-07· cited 5×
• Loveridge v. Omodt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1887-12-16· cited 3×
• Laramy v. Ruschke
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1891-04-27· cited 1×