Karger v. Wangerin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [parol evidence] rule is not one of evidence, but of substantive law — the writing is the contract, not merely the evidence thereof.”
• “what was said during the negotiations * * * must be understood to be superseded by the writing, and so much of what was thus said as is not carried forward into the writing must be deemed to have been waived or abandoned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).