Fishman v. Nielsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the location relied upon must have been acquiesced in for a sufficient length of time to bar a right of entry under the statute of limitations”
• establishing boundary by practical location after neighbors constructed a fence as close as possible to presumed boundary and maintained fence for 24 years
• finding boundary by practical location through acquiescence when two predecessors in title agreed on a line, built a fence on the line, and acquiesced in the line for at least 18 years
• finding boundary by practical location through acquiescence when two predecessors in title agreed on a line, built a fence on the line, and acquiesced in the line for at least 18 years
• finding practical location by acquiescence when parties and their predecessors in title built dividing fence as close as possible to actual boundary and remained satisfied with fence’s location for statutory period
• finding practical location by acquiescence when parties and their predecessors in title built dividing fence as close as possible to actual boundary and remained satisfied with fence’s location for statutory period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).