Ramirez v. Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that records maintained by the EOUSA in criminal files are exempt from the accuracy and damages provisions of the Privacy Act under 28 C.F.R. § 16.81(a)(4), (b)
• concluding that individuals are not liable under the Privacy Act
• explaining that the Privacy Act authorizes suits against agencies of the federal government only, and not against any officers or employees of an agency.
• “Having exempted its records from the substantive provision regarding the agency’s recordkeeping obligations, BOP effectively deprives litigants of a remedy for any harm caused by the agency’s substandard recordkeeping.”
• “Having exempted its records from the substantive provision regarding the agency's recordkeeping obligations, BOP effectively deprives litigants of a remedy for any harm caused by the agency's substandard recordkeeping.”
• “Having exempted its records from the substantive provision regarding the agency's recordkeeping obligations, [the Bureau of Prisons] effectively deprives litigants of a remedy for any harm caused by the agency's substandard recordkeeping.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).