Blofsen v. CUTAIAR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \There was no evidence which indicated [plaintiff] acted any differently than he would have acted had he known he was ineligible for pension benefits.\
• “[U]nder Pennsylvania law[,] the burden rests on the party asserting estoppel to establish the defense by clear, precise and unequivocal evidence.”
• equitable estoppel applies against party that made misrepresentations
• equitable estoppel applies against party that made misrepresentations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).