Akinwande v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no due process violation occurred when immigrant was allowed to cross-examine govern- ment witnesses at length
• interpreting the implementing regulation to “confer[] on the alien the right to appear in person, not the right to direct that all witnesses appear in person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Daniel Salvador Hernandez-Guadarrama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-01-10· cited 116×
• Dhima v. Ashcroft
  First Circuit· 2005-07-28· cited 38×
• Singh v. Ashcroft
  First Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 35×
• Xue Xiang Chen v. Gonzales
  First Circuit· 2005-08-12· cited 28×
• Barrera-Quintero v. Holder, Jr.
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-11-15· cited 28×
• Akinfolarin v. Gonzales
  First Circuit· 2005-09-13· cited 18×
• Long v. Ashcroft
  First Circuit· 2005-09-06· cited 10×
• Petrit Kasneci v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States
  First Circuit· 2005-07-21· cited 3×
• Liu v. Lynch
  S.D. Texas· 2016-03-03· cited 2×
• Hernandez-Guardarrama v. Ashcroft
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-01-10

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias
  Supreme Court· 1992-01-22· cited 8,324×
• Octavia Beltran-Tirado,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-05-31· cited 105×
• Laurent v. Ashcroft
  First Circuit· 2004-02-27· cited 82×
• Angela Figueroa-Torres v. Pedro Toledo-Davila, Julio Per&eacutez-Tirado
  First Circuit· 2000-11-21· cited 68×
• Amparo de Ocasio v. Ashcroft
  First Circuit· 2004-07-14· cited 22×