Xue Xiang Chen v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \That the IJ might have accepted [the - 14 - petitioner's] explanations of his inconsistencies is not to say she was required to do so.\
• “That the [BIA] might have accepted [the petitioner’s] explanations for his inconsistencies is not to say [it] was required to do so.”
• acknowledging circuit split on the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).