Airasian v. Shaak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in admitting expert testimony when appellant failed to seek timely ruling on admissibility under OCGA § 24-9-67.1 (d) but noting that depositions of challenged experts were taken a year and a half prior to pretrial order
• “Both the Supreme Court of Georgia and this Court have ruled that a challenge under OCGA § 24-9-67.1 must be completed by the pretrial conference”
• failure to obtain an express ruling on a constitutional question waives its consideration on appeal
• failure to obtain an express ruling on a constitutional question waives its consideration on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).