Six Flags Over Georgia II, L.P. v. Kull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the absence of words of limitation, words in a statute should be given ‘their ordinary and everyday meaning.’ ”
• “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, judicial construction is not only unnecessary but forbidden.”
• “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, judicial construction is not only unnecessary but forbidden.”
• “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, judicial construction is not only unnecessary but forbidden”
• “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, judicial construction is not only unnecessary but forbidden.”
• “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, judicial construction is not only unnecessary but forbidden.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).