Giannotti v. BELEZA HAIR SALON, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining when a factual contention is one not capable of proof only by expert testimony, it is not necessary to produce expert testimony
• “The proper interpretation of the product instructions was not an issue beyond the ken of laypersons!
• \The proper interpretation of the product instructions was not an issue beyond the ken of laypersons[.]\
• no abuse of discretion for trial court to consider motion in limine to exclude expert testimony when expert was identified two years after interrogatories requesting names and opinions of experts were served and deposition was not scheduled until one week before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).