Skip to main content
· 12/2/2011

Air Sunshine, Inc. v. Carl

Citations

  • 663 F.3d 27
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 23923
  • 2011 WL 6004383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of retaliation claim for lack of causation, where no plausible connection between permit denials and plaintiff's critical comments of defendant's co-worker
  • a retaliation claim cannot be based on conditions that long predated the protected action
  • when considering a motion to dismiss, the court accepts the well-pleaded facts as alleged in the complaint but does \not accept the complaint's legal conclusions of naked assertion[s] devoid of further factual enhancement.\ (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Torruella, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.