McKenna v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because the plaintiff's home was already sold at a foreclosure auction, the \claims for injunctive relief may be moot.\
• noting that because the plaintiff’s home was already sold at a foreclosure auction, the “claims for injunctive relief may be moot.”
• finding a real property interest sufficient to require notice even absent a determination that the mortgagee held the note
• noting that TILA “gives homeowners a right to rescind certain credit transactions”
• reserving the question of which test should apply but expressing a preference for face-value-of-the-loan test
• endorsing face-value- of-the-loan approach where plaintiff alleged that defendant was “no longer the holder of the note . . . and therefore [could not] foreclose on her home”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).