Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/2/2011

Ahrens v. State

Citations

709 S.E.2d 54
392 S.C. 340
2011 S.C. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that issues raised on appeal but not argued in the brief are deemed abandoned and will not be considered by the appellate court
noting textual similarities between SCRS (section 9-1-1790) and PORS statutes and recognizing that an employee’s decision to return to work after retiring was optional, as was an employer’s decision to re-hire that employee
noting the legislature has the right to vest administrative officers and bodies discretion to promulgate rules and regulations; however, an agency may not make rules and regulations that conflict with or change the statute that confers such authority
“An action seeking damages for breach of contract is an action at law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Beatty, Kittredge, Moore, Hearn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.