Skip to main content
· 7/28/1997

Brading v. County of Georgetown

Citations

  • 490 S.E.2d 4
  • 327 S.C. 107
  • 1997 S.C. LEXIS 143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an unchallenged ruling, right or wrong, is the law of the case
  • holding that an unchallenged ruling, right or wrong, is the law of the case
  • recognizing that where a decision is based on more than one ground, an appellate court will affirm unless the appellant appeals all grounds because the unappealed ground will become the law of the case
  • clarifying that where decision is based on more than one ground, appellate court will affirm unless the appellant appeals all grounds because the unappealed ground will become the law of the case
  • clarifying that where decision is based on more than one ground, appellate court will affirm unless the appellant appeals all grounds because the unappealed ground will become the law of the case
  • vacating a ruling related to an issue because the issue “was not before the referee and was unnecessary to his ruling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.