Aguilar v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a statistical analysis was “fundamentally flawed” and could not be used to support pretext because the individuals studied did not provide a relevant basis of comparison to the plaintiff
• determining that a statistical analysis was “fundamentally flawed” and could not be used to support pretext because the individuals studied did not provide a relevant basis of comparison to the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jarmon v. Genachowski
  District of Columbia· 2010-07-02· cited 5×
• Ficken v. Powell
  District of Columbia· 2011-03-25
• Robertson v. United States Government Accountability Office
  District of Columbia· 2011-03-07
• Jarmon v. Martin
  District of Columbia· 2010-07-02

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
• International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
• Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at Arms
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 1,336×
• Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital Center
  D.C. Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 1,302×
• Hazelwood School District v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 1,131×
• Waterhouse v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 2002-08-13· cited 605×
• Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent Gray
  D.C. Circuit· 1993-11-26· cited 539×
• Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-Appellee
  D.C. Circuit· 1995-01-20· cited 493×
• Arrington, Derreck v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 2006-12-29· cited 396×
• Jerome D. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
  D.C. Circuit· 1996-12-06· cited 312×
• Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-Appellants
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-07-01· cited 251×
• Buggs v. Powell
  District of Columbia· 2003-11-19· cited 185×
• Karen Bell, Lolita Hill, Farro Assadi, and Christina Prasinos v. Environmental Protection Agency and Carol M. Browner, in Her Official Capacity
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-11-06· cited 162×
• Krodel v. Young
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-11-20· cited 149×
• Steven J. Albrechtsen v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, Cross-Appellee, and H. Gaylon Greenhill
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-12-13· cited 146×
• Waterhouse v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2000-12-13· cited 111×
• Margaret T. Whitacre v. James F. Davey
  D.C. Circuit· 1989-11-17· cited 64×
• Horvath v. Thompson
  District of Columbia· 2004-04-23· cited 46×