Margaret T. Whitacre v. James F. Davey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence proffered in support of the plaintiffs discrimination claim was inadequate to withstand summary judgment because it failed to compare the number of available, qualified applicants in the protected class to the number of successful applicants in the protected class
• holding that evidence proffered in support of the plaintiff’s discrimination claim was inadequate to withstand summary judgment because it failed to compare the number of available, qualified applicants in the protected class to the number of successful applicants in the protected class
• “We cannot count as controlling a decision that never touched upon the issue we confront” when that point “was simply not considered” in the prior case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).