Federal Claims· 1/23/2006

Advanced Systems Technology, Inc. v. United States

Citations

69 Fed. Cl. 474
2006 U.S. Claims LEXIS 17
2006 WL 172267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding jurisdiction over appeal of an OHA decision made in connection with a procurement
A pre-award bid protestor challenging “the OHA process and the resultant NAICS code and its insertion into the solicitation rendering Plaintiff ineligible” had standing to proceed with its suit.
“[S]ection 555(b) is ‘universally understood to establish the right of an interested person to participate in an on-going agency proceeding.’ ” (quoting Block v. Securities & Exch. Comm’n, 50 F.3d 1078, 1085 (D.C.Cir.1995))
in turn citing Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. LTV Corp., 496 U.S. 633, 655, 110 S.Ct. 2668, 110 L.Ed.2d 579 (1990) and quoting Ronald J. Krotoszyn-ski, Taming the Tail That Wags the Dog: Ex Post and Ex Ante Constraints on Informal Adjudication, 56 Admin. L.Rev. 1057, 1059 (2004)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Advanced Systems Technology, Inc. v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.