Advanced Systems Technology, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding jurisdiction over appeal of an OHA decision made in connection with a procurement
• A pre-award bid protestor challenging “the OHA process and the resultant NAICS code and its insertion into the solicitation rendering Plaintiff ineligible” had standing to proceed with its suit.
• “[S]ection 555(b) is ‘universally understood to establish the right of an interested person to participate in an on-going agency proceeding.’ ” (quoting Block v. Securities & Exch. Comm’n, 50 F.3d 1078, 1085 (D.C.Cir.1995))
• in turn citing Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. LTV Corp., 496 U.S. 633, 655, 110 S.Ct. 2668, 110 L.Ed.2d 579 (1990) and quoting Ronald J. Krotoszyn-ski, Taming the Tail That Wags the Dog: Ex Post and Ex Ante Constraints on Informal Adjudication, 56 Admin. L.Rev. 1057, 1059 (2004)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Advanced Systems Technology, Inc. v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Advanced Systems Technology, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-01-13· cited 4×
• Advanced Systems Technology, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-12-08· cited 1×