Skip to main content

Adams v. State

Citations

  • 601 S.W.2d 881
  • 269 Ark. 548
  • 1980 Ark. LEXIS 1563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that if Arkansas’s equivalent to Rule 2.12(A) “is applicable, then the judge must disqualify on [the judge’s] own initiative or must comply with [the equivalent to Rule 2.12(C)] on [the judge’s] own initiative”
  • concluding that if Arkansas’s equivalent to Rule 2.12(A) “is applicable, then the judge must disqualify on [the judge’s] own initiative or must comply with [the equivalent to Rule 2.12(C)] on [the judge’s] own initiative”
  • Judicial Code requires judge to note disqualification without any request by an attorney — appellate court raises sua sponte on appeal from denial of habeas corpus petition arraigning judge’s failure to recuse himself
  • Judicial Code requires judge to note disqualification without any request by an attorney — appellate court raises sua sponte on appeal from denial of habeas corpus petition arraigning judge's failure to recuse himself
  • prosecutor was the nephew of the judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Core, Fogleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.