Korolko v. Korolko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial judge was not required to recuse when the appellant’s counsel had filed a complaint against the trial judge with the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission
• trial court did not err in refusing to recuse on its own motion where appellant’s counsel notified the trial judge by letter that he had filed a complaint against him with the Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).