Skip to main content

Holloway v. State

Citations

  • 738 S.W.2d 796
  • 293 Ark. 438
  • 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding admission of prior bad acts that had occurred eleven months prior
  • upholding admission of prior bad acts that had occurred eleven months prior
  • judge who issued search warrant not required to recuse himself from hearing to suppress based on invalidity of warrant under Canon 3(C)(1)(a)
  • Canon 3(C)(1)(a) does not require recusal when the judge has obtained knowledge of the facts of the case from previous proceedings in that case
  • Canon 3(C)(1)(a) of the Code of Judicial Ethics does not require a judge who signed the search warrant to recuse himself or herself from presiding over the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern, Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.