Confederate Motors, Inc. v. Terny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant's undue burden argument in Title II ADA case because defendant provided insufficient evidence
• “While Martin’s analysis concerned Title III of the ADA, its import, at least as to the individualized inquiry aspect of that decision, applies with equal force to Title II.”
• “While Martin’s analysis 9 concerned Title III of the ADA, its import, at least as to the individualized 10 inquiry aspect of that decision, applies with equal force to Title II.”
• denying preliminary injunction for ADA Title II claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).