Act, Inc. v. Sylvan Learning Systems, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion for summary judgment on antitrust damages because plaintiff's history of profitability would provide a reasonable basis for determining lost prospective profits
• “Sylvan’s market share, coupled with its use of long-term or exclusive contracts ... demonstrate that there exists a question of fact whether Sylvan had the power to control prices or exclude competition and willfully acquired or maintained that power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).