Skip to main content
· 9/26/2003

Lynn Burchett v. Target Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation

Citations

  • 340 F.3d 510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “negative performance review is not in itself an adverse employment action,” unless “the employer subsequently uses that review to alter the terms or conditions of employment to the detriment of the employee.”
  • affirming summary judgment where plaintiff did not show inability to perform her essential job functions with the accommodations provided
  • affirming summary judgment for employer because employee failed to make an evidentiary showing she needed the requested transfer
  • affirming summary judgment for the employer on an employee’s claim asserting failure to accommodate a request for transfer because the employee failed to make an evidentiary showing she needed the requested transfer as a result of her disability
  • a “negative performance review” is actionable if “subsequently use[d] . . . to alter the terms or conditions of employment to the detriment of the employee”
  • “[T]he employee must also make a facial showing that reasonable accommodation is possible and that the accommodation will allow her to perform the essential functions of the job.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Murphy, Bye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.