Tredrea v. Anesthesia & Analgesia, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where substantial evidence existed to permit the jury to infer an improper motive, the ultimate determination of the issue was for the jury
• holding medical staff bylaws did not constitute a contract and noting that hospitals in some cases are required by statute to promulgate bylaws so consideration may be lacking
• noting that “[i]f the view of these plaintiffs prevailed, the hospital could not scale down or close a department, regardless of the advisability of doing so, without incurring liability”
• listing and explaining the elements of a claim of tortious interference with a prospective business contract
• third-party beneficiaries have standing to enforce provisions of contract that are intended to benefit them
• identifying essentially the same elements of the tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).