Cashner v. Freedom Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that relief under Rule 60(b)(6) is appropriate only under a showing of “unusual or compelling” circumstances
• holding that Rule 60(b)(1) does not allow a party to merely “reargue an issue”
• holding that Rule 60(b)(1) relied is available “only where: (1) a party has made an excusable litigation mistake or an attorney in the litigation has acted without authority from a party, or (2
• recognizing “the delicate balance between the finality of judgment and justice that Rule 60(b) seeks to maintain”
• holding Rule 60(b)(1) “provides for the reconsideration of judgments only where: (1) a party has made an excusable litigation mistake or an attorney in the litigation has acted without authority from a party, or (2
• providing examples of “unanticipated intervening change[s] of circumstances” as extraordinary cases where relief was granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).