Skip to main content
· 10/5/1979

Walter L. Compton, Jr. v. Alton Steamship Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 608 F.2d 96
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 428
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 11359
  • 1980 A.M.C. 2770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that motions \under 60(b)on any ground other than that the judgment is void\ are reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • stating that a district court has “the power in certain restricted circumstances to vacate judgments whenever such action is appropriate to accomplish justice.” (internal quotations and citations omitted)
  • declining to resolve whether district court’s error constituted “mistake” under Rule 60(b)(1) because relief was available under Rule 60(b)(6)
  • noting Rule 60(b) has invested federal courts “with the power in certain restricted circumstances to ‘vacate judgments whenever such action is appropriate to accomplish justice’”
  • declining to resolve whether district court’s error constituted “mistake” under Rule 60(b)(1) because relief was available under Rule 60(b)(6)
  • declining to resolve whether district court’s error constituted “mistake” under Rule 60(b)(1) because relief was available under Rule 60(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell, Field, Copenhaver, Southern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.