Acevedo v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Evidence is excluded upon a motion in limine only if the evidence is clearly inadmissible for any purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
  Supreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
• Luce v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 2,427×
• United States v. Richard Junior Frazier
  Eleventh Circuit· 2004-10-15· cited 1,229×
• Reese v. Herbert
  Eleventh Circuit· 2008-05-16· cited 625×
• United States v. Teresita Sorrels v. NCL (Bahamas), LTD
  Eleventh Circuit· 2015-08-04· cited 139×
• Marjetta Wilkinson v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-01-15· cited 87×
• Dennis Hurst and Joyce Hurst v. United States of America and Don Hight
  Eighth Circuit· 1989-08-09· cited 59×
• Danny Bourque v. Diamond M. Drilling Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1980-08-06· cited 43×
• Mai Thi Tran v. Toyota Motor Corporation
  Eleventh Circuit· 2005-08-18· cited 37×
• Unnamed case
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-10-24· cited 29×
• Raymond J. Pittman v. Harold A. Littlefield, E. Kenneth Littlefield, Edith L. Howard, D/B/A Littlefield Lumber Co.
  First Circuit· 1971-02-24· cited 10×