Dennis Hurst and Joyce Hurst v. United States of America and Don Hight

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that requirement to “immediately” act 20 creates nondiscretionary duty as to when to act
• “Any weaknesses in the factual underpinnings of [the expert’s] opinion go to the weight and credibility of his testimony, not to its admissibility.”
• “Any weaknesses in the factual underpinnings of [the expert’s] opinion go to the weight and credibility of his testimony, not to its admissibility.”
• “Any weaknesses in the factual underpinnings of [the expert’s] opinion go to the weight and credibility of his testimony, not to its admissibility.”
• “Any weaknesses in the factual underpinnings of [the expert’s] opinion go to the weight and credibility of his testimony, not to its admissibility.”
• “A trial court should exclude an expert opinion only if it is so fundamentally unsupported that it cannot help the factfinder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).