S.D. Florida· 7/17/2013
Aceto Corp. v. TherapeuticsMD, Inc.
Citations
- 953 F. Supp. 2d 1269
- 86 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 20
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100605
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]hile [a plaintiff] may not recover under both legal and equitable theories, there is no basis for dispensing with Plaintiffs [sic] unjust enrichment claim at the motion to dismiss stage”
- “While the theory of unjust enrichment is equitable in nature and is, therefore, not available where there is an adequate legal remedy, a plaintiff may maintain an unjust enrichment claim in the alternative to its legal claims”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marra
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-09-05· cited 62×
- Wilson v. Eyerbank, N.A.S.D. Florida· 2015-01-06· cited 41×
- Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. Boldface Licensing + Branding, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2019-04-01· cited 31×
- Melton v. Century Arms, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2017-03-20· cited 16×
- SIG, Inc. v. AT & T Digital Life, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2013-09-12· cited 16×
- Hamilton v. Suntrust Mortgage Inc.S.D. Florida· 2014-03-28· cited 14×
- Weinberg v. Advanced Data Processing, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2015-11-17· cited 14×
- Longest v. Green Tree Servicing LLCC.D. California· 2015-06-19· cited 11×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. A & J Medical Center, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2014-05-15· cited 8×
- Coleman v. CubesmartS.D. Florida· 2018-06-20· cited 8×
- Pincus v. Speedpay, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2015-10-06· cited 4×
- Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. Boldface Licensing + Branding, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2017-08-24· cited 1×
- D.H. Pace Company, Inc. v. OGD Equipment Company, LLCEleventh Circuit· 2023-08-22· cited 1×
- Flatirons Bank v. the Alan W. Steinberg Limited PartnershipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-06
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 1,299×
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court· 1891-02-02· cited 598×
- Lonnie J. Hill v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the ArmyEleventh Circuit· 2003-02-19· cited 506×
- Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2009-08-11· cited 452×
- Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2001-06-08· cited 434×
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court· 1926-01-11· cited 308×
- Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. Por A. v. LamaEleventh Circuit· 2011-02-24· cited 298×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1981-09-08· cited 219×
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1991-09-13· cited 212×
- Textile Productions, Inc. v. Mead Corporation and Fiber Trim Sewing CompanyFederal Circuit· 1998-03-24· cited 201×
- Quabaug Rubber Company v. Fabiano Shoe Co., Inc.First Circuit· 1977-12-01· cited 155×
- PNR, Inc. v. Beacon Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-03-13· cited 150×
- Luis Virgilio v. Terrabrook Vista Lakes, L.P.Eleventh Circuit· 2012-05-18· cited 145×
- Arachnid, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Merit Industries, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1991-11-07· cited 128×
- Abbott Laboratories v. Diamedix Corporation, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1995-02-07· cited 93×
- Weinar v. Rollform Inc.Federal Circuit· 1984-09-17· cited 79×
- Challenge Homes, Inc. v. Greater Naples Care Center, Inc. And Wendell L. KramerEleventh Circuit· 1982-03-05· cited 75×
- Mentor H/s, Inc. v. Medical Device Alliance, Inc., Lysonix, Inc. And Misonix, Inc., Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 2001-02-12· cited 73×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.