Supreme Court of Iowa· 10/18/1978
Abrisz v. Pulley Freight Lines, Inc.
Citations
- 270 N.W.2d 454
- 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 4777
- 1978 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 989
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mentioning that many courts have recently recognized the intentional tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy
- mentioning that many courts have recently recognized the intentional tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy
- Plaintiff, employee was terminated in retaliation for her making untrue statements concerning her employer in support of another employee's application for unemployment benefits. Held, plaintiff's termination did not violate any public policy.
- Plaintiff, employee was terminated in retaliation for her making untrue statements concerning her employer in support of another employee’s application for unemployment benefits. Held, plaintiffs termination did not violate any public policy.
- we first recognized the possibility of public policy exception
- first recognizing the possibility of public policy exception
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reynoldson, Legrand, Rees, Uhlenhopp, Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-08· cited 657×
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 536×
- Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-04-16· cited 162×
- Springer v. Weeks and Leo Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1988-09-21· cited 134×
- Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chemical, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2000-07-06· cited 112×
- Northrup v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1985-07-31· cited 97×
- Fogel v. Trustees of Iowa CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1989-09-20· cited 88×
- Niblo v. Parr Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1989-08-16· cited 85×
- Wolfe v. GraetherSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-07-18· cited 54×
- Rouse v. Farmers State Bank of Jewell, IowaN.D. Iowa· 1994-09-29· cited 47×
- Thompto v. Coborn's Inc.N.D. Iowa· 1994-11-23· cited 41×
- Scholtes v. Signal Delivery Service, Inc.W.D. Arkansas· 1982-09-21· cited 40×
- Maus v. National Living Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-12· cited 39×
- Janda v. Iowa Industrial Hydraulics, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1982-11-24· cited 39×
- Haldeman v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1985-10-16· cited 36×
- Savodnik v. Korvettes, Inc.E.D. New York· 1980-04-23· cited 34×
- Fink v. KitzmanN.D. Iowa· 1995-03-29· cited 32×
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-06-12· cited 31×
- Campbell v. Eli Lilly & Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-06-12· cited 31×
- Anthony Walker v. Ingersoll Cutting Tool CompanySeventh Circuit· 2019-02-20· cited 28×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-07-20· cited 507×
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-05-01· cited 448×
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal· 1959-09-30· cited 340×
- Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court· 1975-06-12· cited 305×
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-02-28· cited 299×
- Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court· 1977-04-21· cited 111×
- Worth H. Percival v. General Motors Corporation, a CorporationEighth Circuit· 1976-07-21· cited 74×
- Allen v. Highway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1976-02-18· cited 40×
- Harper v. Cedar Rapids Television Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1976-08-30· cited 28×
- Drake v. BlockSupreme Court of Iowa· 1956-02-07· cited 25×
- Tschirgi v. Merchants National Bank of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1962-02-06· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.