Skip to main content
· 3/29/1995

Fink v. Kitzman

Citations

  • 881 F. Supp. 1347
  • 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 644
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4740
  • 1995 WL 140212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where employer who fired employee did not know of employee's disability, employee could not prove disability discrimination
  • holding cursory method of discharge raised material issue of fact on question of whether defendant’s proffered legitimate reason, reduction in force, was pretextual
  • considering whether a person with carpal tunnel syndrome was substantially limited in a major life activity
  • lifting restriction caused by carpel tunnel syndrome insufficient, as a matter of law, to demonstrate a significant limitation on the major life activity of working
  • considering whether a person with carpal tunnel syndrome was substantially limited in a major life activity
  • considering whether a person with carpal tunnel syndrome was substantially limited in a major life activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.