District of Columbia· 8/5/2003
Abramoff v. Shake Consulting, L.L.C.
Citations
- 288 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17864
- 2003 WL 22309511
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discerning employer’s “long term commitment to ensuring that . . . officers were covered by disability insurance,” based in part on fact that every shareholder was issued disability insurance
- detailing 733 transactions and alleging “two (2) involved merchandise bearing [the plaintiffs] Marks.”
- “[T]he fact that the plaintiff may feel damages in the District of Columbia does not create venue.”
- “[T]he fact that the plaintiff may feel damages in [a district] does not create venue under section 1391(a)(2).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Elemary v. Philipp Holzmann A.G.District of Columbia· 2008-02-06· cited 31×
- Davis v. American Society of Civil EngineersDistrict of Columbia· 2003-11-04· cited 30×
- Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. MiskiDistrict of Columbia· 2007-07-30· cited 23×
- Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. v. BivinsDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-19· cited 20×
- McQueen v. Woodstream Corp.District of Columbia· 2007-08-10· cited 20×
- McQueen v. HarveyDistrict of Columbia· 2008-07-28· cited 12×
- Brooks Range Petroleum Corporation v. ShearerAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-07-27· cited 10×
- Nabong v. PaddayumanD.C. Circuit· 2018-02-05· cited 4×
- Covey Run, LLC v. Washington Capital, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2016-07-11· cited 1×
- Nabong v. PaddayumanDistrict of Columbia· 2018-02-05
- Corsi v. StoneDistrict of Columbia· 2020-03-01
- El Bey v. Paxton, Jr.District of Columbia· 2021-04-26
- Friends of the Earth v. HaalandDistrict of Columbia· 2022-01-20
- Davis v. Metropolitan Life Ins. C o .D. New Hampshire· 2004-09-13
- Gordon v. Governor of GeorgiaDistrict of Columbia· 2026-06-02
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,362×
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 840×
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorD.C. Circuit· 1983-11-29· cited 490×
- Meier Ex Rel. Meier v. Sun International Hotels, Ltd.Eleventh Circuit· 2002-04-19· cited 334×
- Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Leonardo Martino and Trans One Ii, Inc., a Michigan CorporationThird Circuit· 1994-09-20· cited 319×
- James Cameron v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney GeneralD.C. Circuit· 1993-01-22· cited 272×
- Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict of Columbia· 1996-10-23· cited 225×
- John Sinclair v. Richard G. KleindienstD.C. Circuit· 1983-06-24· cited 189×
- Jenkins Brick Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. John E. Bremer, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, Aaa Spec Block, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2003-02-21· cited 127×
- Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict of Columbia· 2002-04-29· cited 66×
- 2215 Fifth Street Associates, LP v. U-Haul International, Inc.District of Columbia· 2001-07-09· cited 61×
- Buchanan, Jasper N. v. Manley, AudreyD.C. Circuit· 1998-06-23· cited 60×
- Sharp Electronics Corporation v. Hayman Cash Register CompanyD.C. Circuit· 1981-05-04· cited 58×
- Cellutech, Inc. v. Centennial Cellular Corp.District of Columbia· 1994-12-23· cited 42×
- Government of Egypt Procurement Office v. M/V Robert E. LeeD. Maryland· 2002-05-21· cited 42×
- Bigham v. Envirocare of Utah, Inc.S.D. Texas· 2000-12-06· cited 30×
- Woodke v. DahmEighth Circuit· 1995-11-28· cited 28×
- Dunham v. Hotelera Canco S.A. De C.V.E.D. Virginia· 1996-07-23· cited 18×
- Johnson v. Washington Gas Light Co.District of Columbia· 2000-03-17· cited 11×
- Gaines, Emhof, Metzler & Kriner v. NisbergW.D. New York· 1994-02-24· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.