Skip to main content
· 12/26/2023

Abram v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]o allow the loser at a pretrial suppression hearing to demand a de novo determination at trial” would defeat the purposes of promoting judicial efficiency and ensuring that trials not be interrupted or delayed
  • noting that “[t]o allow the loser at a pretrial suppression hearing to demand a de novo determination at trial” would defeat the purposes of promoting judicial efficiency and ensuring that trials not be interrupted or delayed
  • identification of suspect in a police car held improper when there was no showing that the victim-witness was in danger of death, or could not attend a normal lineup
  • authorizing government appeals from pre-trial orders suppressing evidence
  • authorizing government appeals from pre-trial orders suppressing evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.