Abraham v. Singh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was a pattern of racketeering when there was no reason to believe the predicate acts would not have continued indefinitely had suit not been filed
• holding that two years was sufficient
• finding open-ended continuity where “systematic victimization” was likely to “have continued indefinitely had the Plaintiffs not filed this lawsuit”
• plaintiff’s assertions “alone cannot create a genuine issue of material fact sufficient to survive summary judgment”
• noting RICO continuity prong not subject to “stringent pleading standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).