Calcasieu Marine National Bank v. Thomas Arthur Grant, Iii, Suzanne Brunazzi Grant v. Thomas A. Grant, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• highlighting that “[e]ven where acts may support indictment for mail or wire fraud, they may be insufficient for RICO liability”
• “Congress wrote RICO in broad, sweeping terms; it did not intend to extend RICO to every fraudulent commercial transaction.”
• “there is no threat here of continued criminal acts. [Defendant’s] acts which were alleged to have deprived [plaintiff] of a property interest were, when completed, without threat of repetition.”
• “Short-term criminal conduct is not the concern of RICO.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).