Skip to main content

Abercrombie v. State

Citations

  • 677 S.E.2d 719
  • 297 Ga. App. 522
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1467
  • 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the exclusion of an accomplice's completed and apparently unquestioned guilty plea was improperly excluded under the Chambers rationale
  • holding that the exclusion of an accomplice’s completed and apparently unquestioned guilty plea was improperly excluded under the Chambers rationale
  • conviction reversed because trial court failed to list any factors and simply found that the evidence of three-year-old conviction would have probative value and thus was admissible under OCGA § 24-9-84.1 (a) (2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Ellington, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.