Quiroz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial courts should consider the kind of felony involved, the date of the conviction, and the importance of the witness’ credibility
• holding that variance between indictment alleging that defendant held knife to victim’s neck and proof that defendant only pointed knife at victim was not fatal to conviction for aggravated assault
• ruling that the trial court is required to make an express finding on the record that balances the probity of a prior felony conviction against its prejudicial effect pursuant to the statutory language of OCGA § 24-9-84.1 (a) (2
• requiring trial courts to make express findings that a prior conviction’s probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect
• requiring court to make express findings on the record before admitting felonies for impeachment purposes
• requiring trial courts to make express findings that a prior conviction’s probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).