Ninth Circuit· 3/4/2021
Abdi Ali Aden v. Robert Wilkinson
Citations
- 989 F.3d 1073
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “physical harm plus something more, such as credible death threats” compels a finding of past persecution
- holding that even if “a reasonable factfinder could conclude” the harm rose to the level of persecution, the record “did not compel” it
- holding that even if “a reasonable factfinder could conclude” the harm rose to the level of persecution, the record “did not compel” it
- explaining that asylum applicant must establish nexus by demonstrating persecution “on account of a statutorily protected ground”
- explaining that to meet the nexus requirement for asylum, “an applicant must show that the protected ground was ‘at least one central reason’ the applicant was persecuted” (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i))
- finding petitioner established past persecution where he was beaten and his brother received death threats
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Singh v. GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-03-22· cited 36×
- Stephen Fon v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2022-05-18· cited 33×
- Corpeno-Romero v. GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-10-22· cited 20×
- Aleman-Belloso v. GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-11-13· cited 16×
- Oscar v. BondiNinth Circuit· 2025-04-23· cited 9×
- Kumar v. GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-08-02· cited 6×
- Lapadat v. BondiNinth Circuit· 2025-02-12· cited 5×
- Mario Flores Molina v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2022-06-13
- NERY SALGUERO SOSA V. MERRICK GARLANDNinth Circuit· 2022-12-16
- Shamsher Singh v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2023-01-12
- Lapadat v. BondiNinth Circuit· 2025-07-31
- E-M-F-SBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2026-01-09
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court· 1992-01-22· cited 8,324×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court· 2002-11-04· cited 3,361×
- Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1995-07-06· cited 998×
- Kamla Prasad Meena Kumari Prasad Catherine Sandhya Prasad Micky Sudesh Prasad Ricky Sumit Prasad v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1995-02-01· cited 928×
- Shpetim Hoxha v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2003-02-18· cited 843×
- Baljinder Singh SANGHA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentNinth Circuit· 1997-01-09· cited 716×
- Mario Ernesto Navas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2000-06-20· cited 674×
- Xiaoguang Gu v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-07-21· cited 582×
- Parussimova v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2009-01-26· cited 543×
- Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Jefferson SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-03-08· cited 489×
- Hossein Nahrvani v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-03-07· cited 383×
- Teresita Moral BORJA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentNinth Circuit· 1999-04-30· cited 327×
- In the Matter of Fritz Desir v. David N. Ilchert, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1988-05-26· cited 323×
- Vera KORABLINA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentNinth Circuit· 1998-10-23· cited 285×
- Cesar M. Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-05-03· cited 274×
- Ashok Chand Premila Mudaliar Chand v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2000-08-02· cited 273×
- Espectacion Bolanos-Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1985-06-14· cited 257×
- Duarte De Guinac v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1999-06-08· cited 216×
- Delphine Arrey v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-02-26· cited 199×
- Andriasian v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1999-06-11· cited 184×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.