Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an asylum applicant's due process rights were not violated where the BIA clearly considered the documentary evidence contained in the record
• concluding that an asylum applicant’s due process rights were not violated where the BIA clearly considered the documentary evidence contained in the record
• holding that “where private discrimination is neither condoned by the state nor the prevailing social norm, it clearly does not amount to 'persecution' within the meaning of the Act.”
• holding that “persecution is an extreme concept that does not include every sort of treatment our society regards as offensive”
• holding that “where private discrimination is neither condoned by the state nor the prevailing social norm” it does not constitute persecution
• holding that “where private discrimination is neither con- doned by the state nor the prevailing social norm, it clearly does not amount to ‘persecution’ within the meaning of the Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).