Ninth Circuit· 4/7/1998
Abboud v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Citations
- 140 F.3d 843
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 3523
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2548
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6807
- 1998 WL 156523
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that beneficiary of his father’s relative petition had suffered Article III injury
- finding that a lost 7 opportunity represents a concrete injury
- finding that a lost opportunity represents a concrete injury
- finding that a lost opportunity represents a concrete injury
- “This lost 12 opportunity represents a concrete injury to Abboud that is traceable to [USCIS’s] 13 conduct and remediable by a favorable decision in this case.”
- “This lost 12 opportunity represents a concrete injury to Abboud that is traceable to [USCIS’s] 13 conduct and remediable by a favorable decision in this case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Magill, Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- LSO, Ltd. v. StrohNinth Circuit· 2000-03-06· cited 229×
- Paul A. Wright, on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Persons v. Chase RivelandNinth Circuit· 2000-07-11· cited 215×
- Hakim Iddir v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-06· cited 168×
- Mantena v. JohnsonSecond Circuit· 2015-12-30· cited 111×
- Gonzalez-Medina v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-04-07· cited 50×
- Spencer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2003-09-17· cited 47×
- Smirnov v. ClintonDistrict of Columbia· 2011-07-14· cited 41×
- Shashikant Patel v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Servs.Sixth Circuit· 2013-10-11· cited 37×
- Barapind v. RenoE.D. California· 1999-06-04· cited 37×
- Shanti, Inc. v. RenoD. Minnesota· 1999-02-16· cited 34×
- Shalom Pentecostal Church v. Acting Secretary United States Department of Homeland SecurityThird Circuit· 2015-04-07· cited 33×
- Mark Brown v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-08-18· cited 32×
- Mart v. BeebeD. Oregon· 2000-05-15· cited 19×
- Nat'l Venture Capital Ass'n v. DukeD.C. Circuit· 2017-12-01· cited 19×
- CDI Information Services, Inc. v. RenoSixth Circuit· 2002-01-28· cited 17×
- Pai v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 2011-09-02· cited 11×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1999-03-18· cited 8×
- Kettle Range Conservation Group v. United States Forest ServiceNinth Circuit· 2001-04-20· cited 3×
- Calexico Warehouse, Inc. v. NeufeldS.D. California· 2002-11-26· cited 2×
- Evangelical Lutheran Church in America v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2003-10-30· cited 2×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 1,478×
- American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. RenoNinth Circuit· 1995-11-08· cited 121×
- George Bernard Nicholas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1979-02-02· cited 78×
- Alexander Komarenko v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1994-09-09· cited 72×
- Ramsis Ghaly, Dr. v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSeventh Circuit· 1995-02-10· cited 62×
- Karen Yuen Fong YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States, DefendantAppelleeNinth Circuit· 1997-06-04· cited 35×
- Lucy Ko Yao v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1993-08-11· cited 31×
- Romeiro De Silva v. SmithNinth Circuit· 1985-10-07· cited 22×
- Antonia Tavares Dodig v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1993-11-22· cited 10×
- Sanchez-Trujillo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service of the United States Department of JusticeW.D. North Carolina· 1985-10-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.