Indiana Supreme Court· 3/28/1989
Abbott v. State
Citations
- 535 N.E.2d 1169
- 1989 Ind. LEXIS 93
- 1989 WL 29314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affidavit from accomplice’s brother that the accomplice said that the defendant was not involved in the crime was merely impeaching and did not justify a new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Givan, Shepard, Debruler, Pivarnik, Dickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-29· cited 139×
- Ludy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-03-06· cited 128×
- Crain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-10-20· cited 61×
- Bardonner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-03-12· cited 32×
- Rubalcada v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-06-30· cited 30×
- McCord v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-26· cited 20×
- Purvi Patel v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-07-22· cited 10×
- Rolly B. Dulworth v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-05-14
- Darius Shawtee McNary v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-08-21
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alfaro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 145×
- Drollinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-08-26· cited 122×
- Newman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1975-10-03· cited 102×
- Richey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-10-06· cited 75×
- Wilson v. IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-08-18· cited 35×
- Green v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1960-06-30· cited 20×
- Stanley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-09· cited 9×
- Tevis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-17· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.