Skip to main content
· 8/18/1993

Abbott v. Amoco Oil Co.

Citations

  • 619 N.E.2d 789
  • 249 Ill. App. 3d 774
  • 189 Ill. Dec. 88
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 1268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that duty of good faith and fair dealing limits manner of exercise of discretion by party vested with discretion; discretion must be exercised reasonably with proper motive, not arbitrarily, capriciously, or inconsistent with reasonable expectations of parties
  • “[U]nfair advantage is the key to differentiating between the types of adhesion contracts .... ”
  • “[T]he dealers cannot complain when Amoco merely exercises the discretion the dealers allowed Amoco to possess. Bad faith or unfairness needs to be pleaded affirmatively in a case like the present one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inglis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.