Compton v. Country Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court’s 8 1-09-3044 decision to allow amendments before judgment is reviewed differently than a trial court’s decision to allow amendments after judgment
• language of insurance policy asserting the company’s interest in funds recovered by its policyholder from third parties was sufficient to create a lien, despite the absence of that term from the provision
• this standard applies when denial is based on trial court's application of existing law
• a dismissal should be granted only where “ ‘it is clearly apparent that the plaintiffs could prove no set of facts that would entitle them to relief’ ” (quoting Guinn v. Hoskins Chevrolet, 361 Ill. App. 3d 575, 586 (2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).